Arts Infusion at Comly School…One Country at a Time

A recent Inquirer article (6-Year-Old’s Trip: Panic, Questions, June 9) pointed out the crisis that ensued when a kindergartener left Comly Elementary school in search of his mother.

1006_4396 comly rain forestA recent visit exposed a different side of the coin: reasons kids would want to stay at Comly School. Comly’s new principal is using the arts to engage students in cross-curricular, innovative projects. This spring, 5th graders depicted the Brazilian rainforest in a 4-layered mural illustrating the ecosystem. 3rd graders created intricate cloth weavings, mimicking print traditions of India. Kindergarteners wrote and will perform Friday at 1pm songs based on Aesop’s Fables.

With the support of a strong Home and School Association, Philadelphia Arts in Education Partnership and Public Citizens for Children and Youth’s Picasso Project, and staff art and music teachers, Comly is becoming an arts-infused, compelling place for students to be. PAEP, who supplied many of the resident artists, can supply further detail. I urge readers to visit this school and get a complete picture of the positive atmosphere that is developing through the arts.

Protecting Soda, Not Poor Black Kids

BEHIND the soda-tax debate is a much bigger (and more shameful) issue – our city’s embrace of pushing non-nutritious, sugar-drenched soda products disproportionately on poor black children.

One of the arguments put forth by the soda industry against additional taxes is that being forced to pay more for soda is somehow a “burden” to people living in low-income inner-city Philadelphia. It’s like saying anything other than keeping the price of crack down is unfair to poor Philadelphians because they have less money than others with which to buy it.

Here’s a news flash for elected officials, business leaders and community members who’ve rushed to the defense of soda sales: Soda has NO nutritional value. Soda has a negative effect on tooth enamel. The sugar in soda contributes to diabetes and obesity, which disproportionately affect poor black communities.

Yet people actually believe that, in these health-challenged communities, soda sales should be protected.

Employers are quick to point out that soda sales can make up 30 to 50 percent of the profits for neighborhood mom-and-pop stores and Latino bodegas.

Watching little black children walking to the corner store several times a day and exiting with a can of Pepsi and a bag of honey-barbecue cheese twirls is a time-honored tradition in many parts of inner-city black Philadelphia. I think it’s a tradition we in the black and Latino community need to reconsider.

Unsurprisingly, parents in many non-black, non-low-income communities in and around the city don’t even allow their youngsters to drink soda. I don’t hear Pepsi and Coca-Cola bottlers defending those children’s right to consume.

It’s time store owners help our children – all of them – grow healthier. When public perception finally turned against tobacco, farmers and manufacturers began diversifying into other industries. If Philadelphia’s store owners are so dependent on pushing unhealthy products on those residents who can least afford the health effects, they should invest in other products to sell.

I’m confident that these communities where the corner store is the only store accessible without public transportation will come to accept inexpensive, creatively packaged fruit juices or other beverages.

What else are they going to do? Quench their thirst with fluoride-infused tap water?

If elected officials, lobbyists and others want to protect soda sales, at least be honest about your motives, whatever they may be. But please don’t defend soda in the name of equity and fairness in the poor black community.

A Letter to the Editor – The Philadelphia Inquirer, 4/25/2010:

A Letter to the Editor – New Revenue for Pennsylvania

Sunday’s story (April 25, 2010) about cuts to education funding in New Jersey, New York and 27 other states shows the need for increased commitment from Washington and Harrisburg to help local school districts weather the current recession.

The story quotes an official from the Pennsylvania school boards association saying a financial crunch here is “farther down the road than New Jersey, but it’s going to be ugly.”   But this is not inevitable if state lawmakers act now to protect Pennsylvania from similarly devastating cuts.

That’s why some Pennsylvania lawmakers have proposed to generate new state revenue to support early childhood education, schools and other essential services after federal economic stimulus funds expire in 2011.  They would do this by closing corporate tax loopholes and taxing smokeless tobacco, cigars and the extraction of natural gas from the Marcellus Shale, protecting Pennsylvania communities from the fate that our neighbors are experiencing across the river.

The rest of Pennsylvania’s General Assembly should follow their lead by supporting these commonsense measures to protect Pennsylvania’s investment in its future.